My last kid
graduates from college next month and he will receive his degree without having
read a single novel as a class assignment. I have five offspring — two
suffering from DFAFW syndrome (DNA From A Failed Writer) and three stepchildren
whose bloodlines are pure. My stepchildren have had me around since they were
very small, which poses the whole Nature vs. Nurture conundrum. Personally, I
don’t buy the Nature concept. Both my biologic and step-children think my jokes
are lame and know one is coming long before it spills from my lips. Apparently,
I have an expression they’ve deemed my “joke face,” that telegraphs an
impending punchline. I don’t mind the description, although it resurrects some
painful memories as the nickname “Jokeface” meant something entirely different
when I was in the seventh grade.
So . . . when
I went to college, all freshman were required to take a course called English
101. These classes were generally taught by graduate students who fell into
three categories: 1) first year grad students who were earnest and a bit
awkward, desperately seeking to connect with their students in a meaningful
way, 2) second year grad students who hated their students, and 3) third year
grad students who really, really hated their students.
We were
assigned novels to read. In my English 101 class, we read Portnoy’s Complaint, Catch-22,
The Ox-Bow Incident, and Roughing It among others. We would
discuss the books in class, making an effort to decode them with the assumption
that the authors had hidden themes within an overarching narrative. As I
recall, all of the authors hid Messiah analogies in their books. At least that
was the opinion of the girl who sat at the front and never shut up. I’m not
sure Philip Roth, Joseph Heller, Walter Van Tilburg Clark, and Mark Twain knew this, but would undoubtedly have been
grateful to the Girl Who Never Shut Up for divining their true intent.
The graduate
student who taught the class was at the beginning of his second year, his
hostility not yet in full bloom. He hung in there with us for about a month
before giving in, one day shouting at the Girl Who Never Shut Up, “The Ox-Bow Incident is not about the
Messiah, you moron. It’s about the Nazis. It was a warning that mob violence
could happen anywhere.”
For those who
haven’t read The Ox-Bow Incident, it
tells the story of three innocent men who are accused of rustling. A lynch mob
tries and then hangs the men, one of whom is a bounder, one who is
helpless and confused, and a third who is so obviously chaste and pure of
heart, one might compare him to . . . well, you get the picture. To be honest,
at the time I agreed with the Girl Who Never Shut Up as her analogy made sense
and I wanted to date her. However, our grad student instructor set us all
straight, revealing that Van Tilburg Clark, fourteen years after his book’s
original 1940 publication, wrote that The
Ox-Bow Incident was an attempt to illustrate the madness infecting Nazi
Germany and to show that it existed everywhere, a disease that could become an
epidemic when men allowed prejudice and fear to supersede the rule of law.
What do
today’s young people read? Harry Potter, Twilight and Hunger Games books, I
guess. At least they’re reading. However, I learned a lot in English 101,
especially after college when I re-read everything. The lessons learned were
applied elsewhere. Unlike some others, I believe that one does use algebra and
geometry past the tenth grade and that classic novels are teachers who do not
hate us. I learned much about the conflict between academic and private
practice medicine from Arrowsmith,
about hubris and redemption from The
Magnificent Ambersons, about the sexual double standard imposed on women
from Tess of the D’Urbervilles. I
think I also learned the difference between good writers and great ones. That
can be a sobering lesson for a writer. We all want to be great, but must learn
to accept that we may only be good. It’s no reason to give up any more than
someone stops playing pickup basketball the day they realize that a career in
the NBA is out of the question.
I wish my kids
had been forced to read more novels in college. Even though the Girl Who Never
Shut Up was wrong in her interpretations, the process of dissecting a work is
an important part of becoming a writer. She became a writer, the Girl Who Never
Shut Up. She’s good, but not great. Unfortunately, none of her books are read
by today’s college freshman, because she spurns vampires and Amazonian archers.
That’s a shame, because pretty much everything she writes is a Messiah analogy.
We had lots of earnest young men with longish hair, hot on the trail of angst and confusion. They were happy with that, and pot was their drug of choice, to sooth all that angst. Confusion, however, stuck around for good long time. Ah, those were the days.
ReplyDeleteOh boy...I think I was the girl who never shut up. Still am. ;)
ReplyDeleteSo that means I can cheat off your paper, right?
Delete